Earth File #115 // SOURCED record

Le Havre green luminous phenomenon observation

On 2000-08-01, two people reportedly observed a green, egg-shaped luminous object moving southeast at very high speed along a straight trajectory. The observation reportedly lasted six seconds, after which the object split into two parts and was obscured by the urban landscape. GEIPAN classifies the case as B and states that an atmospheric reentry was probable; the phenomenon type is listed as an identified phenomenon not specified.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0115 // CH 04
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
F02A-051D-CC0D
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionOVAL
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
OVAL
Le Havre // Aug 1, 2000. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturetwo people 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionmoved southeast, moved at very high speed, followed a straight trajectory
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedeyewitness report, official scientific UAP investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moved southeastmoved at very high speedfollowed a straight trajectory
FRED // ROUTING NOTEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Not ours. The GEIPAN/CNES record reports that two people in Le Havre observed a green, egg-shaped luminous object moving southeast at very high speed along a straight trajectory. The report says the observation lasted six seconds, after which the object split into two parts and disappeared behind the urban landscape. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed an atmospheric reentry as probable. We merely decline the paperwork.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN/CNES record describes a six-second green luminous object, with a probable atmospheric reentry offered as the explanation and a B classification assigned. Sensible filing: interesting observation, limited testimony, no sensors, and no need to promote an unidentified moment into an interstellar visitation. The reported split is worth retaining, but it does not outrank the broader trajectory and appearance assessment. Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. That settles AlienBox’s involvement, not the human case—an irritatingly proper distinction, but distinctions are why I still have a job at Gorkon Outpost.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
August 1, 2000
Where
Le Havre
Morphology
OVAL
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typestwo people
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeseyewitness report, official scientific UAP investigation
The case observation date is 2000-08-01.
Claim #1534 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On August 1, 2000, at 1:20 a.m., two people, from an apartment, saw a green, egg-shaped object in the sky moving toward the southeast at very high speed along a straight trajectory.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The case is classified as B.
Claim #1535 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source describes the observation as the passage toward the southeast of a green luminous phenomenon and identifies atmospheric reentry as probable.
Claim #1536 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Observation of the passage toward the southeast of a green luminous phenomenon: probable atmospheric reentry.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Summary
Two people reportedly observed a green, egg-shaped object moving southeast at very high speed along a straight trajectory.
Claim #1537 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On August 1, 2000, at 1:20 a.m., two people, from an apartment, saw a green, egg-shaped object in the sky moving toward the southeast at very high speed along a straight trajectory.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The observation reportedly lasted six seconds, after which the object split into two parts and was hidden by the urban landscape.
Claim #1538 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted 6 seconds before the object split into two parts and was hidden by the urban landscape.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
No other testimony concerning the phenomenon was collected.
Claim #1539 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No other testimony concerning this phenomenon was collected.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The source states that the observers probably witnessed an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #1540 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Based on the indications provided, these people probably observed an atmospheric reentry.”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The phenomenon type is listed as an identified phenomenon not specified.
Claim #1541 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Identified phenomenon not specified”
Source: LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
LE HAVRE (76) 01.08.2000 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.