Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeseyewitnesses, two observation testimonies
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typestestimonies, official scientific investigation
The case observation date is 14 September 2014.
Claim #15943 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
14/09/2014”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified as category A.
Claim #15944 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is identified as a Thai lantern.
Claim #15945 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Thai lantern”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
Several round yellow-colored points of light were observed in the sky over Val-de-Marne between Champigny-sur-Marne and Créteil.
Claim #15946 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“several round yellow-colored points of light were observed in the sky over Val-de-Marne (94), between the municipalities of Champigny-sur-Marne (94) and Créteil (94).”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The observed objects came from the northeast, moved slowly and silently in a straight line, and appeared in successive waves.
Claim #15947 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Coming from the northeast, these objects traveled slowly and silently in a straight line, in successive waves.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The number of observed points was estimated at around forty.
Claim #15948 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“Their number was estimated at around forty points.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
Two observation testimonies were collected.
Claim #15949 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Two observation testimonies were collected.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The Air Transport Gendarmerie handled the case after the witnesses reported it to that organization.
Claim #15950 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“as the witnesses reported the case to the Air Transport Gendarmerie, which was particularly attentive at that time to small objects flying at low altitude (drones in particular), this observation case was handled directly by that organization with particular care.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The investigation established that the phenomenon was caused by 35 Thai lanterns released to celebrate a civil solidarity pact.
Claim #15951 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The investigation made it possible to establish the origin of the phenomenon with certainty: 35 Thai lanterns released to celebrate a civil solidarity pact (PACS).”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
Authorization to release the lanterns had been requested from the prefecture and granted.
Claim #15952 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The release of these lanterns had been the subject of a request for authorization submitted to the prefecture, and authorization had been granted.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as perfectly identified, in category A, as an observation of Thai lanterns.
Claim #15953 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN therefore classifies this case as perfectly identified, in category A: observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: SAINT-MAURICE (94) 14.09.2014
// [[T0002]] Description