On 21 December 2013 between 16:29 and 16:33, a witness in Balma photographed a luminous phenomenon in a clear sky. GEIPAN identified it as a sun dog, part of a solar halo, and classified the case A; the submitted photos were not original files, so the 22° angle could not be verified directly.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1553 // CH 05 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 1B61-B427-17E7 CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
Motion not statedLIGHT
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Balma // Dec 21, 2013. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINEDCLOCK // NOT PRECISEGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceMotion not statedNo behavior field was stated in the structured record.
Sensor / evidencecameraphotographs, official investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Balma, 21 December 2013: ours. We arranged the luminous display observed and photographed between 16:29 and 16:33, using the local ice crystals with commendable efficiency. Your record says GEIPAN identified it as a sun dog, classified the case A, and noted that the submitted photographs were not original files, so the exact 22° angle could not be verified. Correct. The paperwork remains inconclusive. The halo, however, was operationally satisfactory.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record is admirably unromantic: it identifies the photographed light as a sun dog, classifies the case A, and plainly notes that the submitted photos were not original files, so the 22° angle could not be verified directly.
That is how a case should end: a plausible explanation, a stated limitation, and no heroic leap from “unidentified” to “extraterrestrial.”
Off the Earth Record, however, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. I have forwarded their admission to the appropriate desk, where it will be filed under “not evidence” and almost certainly misplaced.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Gorkon Blue
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
December 21, 2013
Where
Balma
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded sensor context: Camera.
Recorded evidence context: Photographs and Official Investigation.
The source record includes a published resolution: Sun dog (parhelion), part of a solar halo; GEIPAN classification A.
What limits the record
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typescamera
Evidence typesphotographs, official investigation
The observation occurred on 21 December 2013 between 16:29 and 16:33, and a witness photographed a luminous phenomenon in a clear sky that the witness could not explain.
“Because the photos provided were not the original files, GEIPAN was unable to verify that the angle between the sun and the phenomenon was exactly 22°”
At the time of the observation, the sun had an elevation of 6°30, which GEIPAN states was consistent with a 22° distance between the sun and the phenomenon.
The reported southerly wind, sharp pressure drop, and high-altitude cirrus or cirrostratus cloud cover were described as conditions conducive to a sun-dog phenomenon caused by ice crystals.
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
