Earth File #1635 // SOURCED record

Reported red-orange luminous points over Ham

GEIPAN records a reported observation on 17 February 2013 at around 19:50, in which a witness and his wife observed four aligned red-orange luminous points above Ham, followed by additional similar points. The reported lights moved slowly and silently toward the witnesses for approximately 10 minutes. GEIPAN classified the case as B and identified it as probably involving Thai lanterns.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1635 // CH 11
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
100E-8DBB-9426
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Ham, Picardy, Somme // Feb 17, 2013 19:50. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness, witness's wife 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved slowly, moved silently, approached the witnesses
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official GEIPAN investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)12 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moved slowlymoved silentlyapproached the witnesses
FRED // CLASSIFICATION DISPUTEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your archive records that, on 17 February 2013, a witness and his wife reported four aligned red-orange points above Ham, followed by additional points moving slowly and silently for about ten minutes. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as probably involving Thai lanterns. We do not recognize the reported phenomenon either. This is unusual. Our catalogue contains several thousand categories for lights, and somehow none of them is “please consult the lantern paperwork.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s B classification points to Thai lanterns: red-orange lights, grouped movement, and trajectories consistent with the recorded wind. A pleasingly ordinary label, at last—though the directional account still contains a small contradiction, because apparently even luminous objects deserve paperwork disputes. Off the Earth Record, our office does not recognize this one either. No family member has claimed the lanterns, no coworker has filed a retrieval note, and Gorkon’s registry offers nothing useful beyond its usual talent for losing the useful page. Unidentified is not extraterrestrial, but it is also not an invitation to inflate a resolved observation into a cosmic incident.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2013-02-17 19:50:00
Where
Ham, Picardy, Somme
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 12 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Official GEIPAN Investigation, and Official Classification.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Thai lanterns, according to GEIPAN's classification and assessment.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness, witness's wife
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official GEIPAN investigation, official classification
The case records an observation date of 17 February 2013.
Claim #17046 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 17/02/2013”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is located in the Picardy region and Somme department.
Claim #17047 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Picardy Department Somme”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as B.
Claim #17048 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
On February 17, 2013, at around 7:50 p.m., a witness and his wife observed four aligned red-orange luminous points above the village of Ham.
Claim #17049 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On February 17, 2013, at around 7:50 p.m., a witness and his wife observed four aligned red-orange luminous points above the village of Ham.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The luminous points moved slowly and silently toward the witnesses, and other identical luminous points appeared during an observation lasting approximately 10 minutes.
Claim #17050 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“They moved slowly and silently toward the witnesses.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN reported that the witness later clarified the phenomenon was arriving at “13h,” facing the witness, who was returning to Ham in an easterly direction.
Claim #17051 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 92% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN contacted the witness by telephone to clarify the direction in which the phenomenon was moving: it was arriving at “13h,” facing the witness, who was returning to HAM, in an easterly direction.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported balls crossed the road almost vertically above the witness and were hidden by sugar refinery buildings to the north of the road.
Claim #17052 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“The balls crossed the road almost vertically above the witness and were hidden by”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported movement was from east/southeast toward west/northwest, according to the source's interpretation, although the witness gave a different indication in the detailed testimony.
Claim #17053 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 93% extraction confidence
“The balls were therefore traveling from E/SE toward W/NW (the witness gives a different indication in the detailed testimony).”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
The reported movement was consistent with the wind recorded at Albert, which was from the southeast at that time.
Claim #17054 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Since the wind, as recorded at Albert, was from the southeast at that time, the objects’ movement was consistent with the wind.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
The red-orange appearance, grouping, and identical trajectories were described as indications pointing toward the passage of Thai lanterns.
Claim #17055 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The red-orange appearance of the balls, their grouping, and the identical trajectories are all indications pointing toward the passage of Thai lanterns.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case as B and identified the observation as an observation of Thai lanterns.
Claim #17056 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “B”: observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
The case summary characterizes the observation as probably involving the passage of Thai lanterns.
Claim #17057 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the passage of red-orange luminous points in the sky: probable observation of the passage of Thai lanterns.”
Source: HAM (80) 17.02.2013 // [[T0001]] Summary
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
HAM (80) 17.02.2013 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.