On August 27, 2012, at 10:00 p.m., a motorist and passengers observed a moving white and green luminous phenomenon in the sky. GEIPAN classified the case C because the testimony was inconsistent; a possible fireball or meteorite-fall explanation was considered but not confirmed.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1687 // CH 17 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 9E11-C09E-8218 NIGHT
Reported rapid motionLIGHT
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Montsalvy, Cantal, Auvergne // Aug 27, 2012 22:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATANIGHTGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturemotorist, passengers 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionmoving, very fast
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedtestimony, official investigation record
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s)location precision: localitymovingvery fast
FRED // ROUTING NOTEShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. On 27 August 2012, we conducted a brief transit above Montsalvy, producing the white-and-green luminous phenomenon reported by a motorist and passengers at approximately 10 p.m. The Earth Record preserves this as one reported testimony and notes insufficiently consistent detail. GEIPAN classified the case C; a possible fireball or meteorite fall was considered but not confirmed. Our flight log is clearer. Naturally, it is filed somewhere near Gorkon Outpost.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A motorist and passengers reported a very fast white-and-green light; GEIPAN classified the case C because the testimony was too inconsistent to confirm even the possible fireball explanation. Sensible. “Luminous phenomenon” is an honest label. It is also the bureaucratic equivalent of putting a specimen in a box marked *possibly something* and congratulating oneself on the handwriting.
Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, we finally noticed us. The Visitors are taking responsibility. No, this does not upgrade the human record to proof of anything extraterrestrial; it merely means the filing problem has acquired relatives. I’ll be forwarding the accountability form to Gorkon Outpost, where it will be misplaced with traditional efficiency.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Sublight Lager
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2012-08-27 22:00:00
Where
Montsalvy, Cantal, Auvergne
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Testimony and Official Investigation Record.
The source record includes a published resolution: Possible fireball or meteorite fall was considered but not confirmed; GEIPAN classified the case C because of insufficiently consi....
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Source: MONTSALVY (15) 27.08.2012
// [[T0001]] Case details
On August 27, 2012, at 10:00 p.m., a motorist and passengers observed a moving white and green luminous phenomenon in the sky; only one testimony was reported.
“On August 27, 2012, at 10:00 p.m., a motorist and his passengers were intrigued by the presence in the sky of a moving white and green luminous phenomenon. Only one testimony was reported.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
