Earth File #1711 // SOURCED record

Courbevoie observation of a large dark object

GEIPAN records an observation on 27 July 2012 over Courbevoie of a reportedly silent, large, dark-colored object moving at constant speed. The case was classified B; the investigation concluded it was probably wind-borne debris, with the object's speed and direction potentially compatible with the wind. The testimony came from a single witness and no photograph was available.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1711 // CH 03
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
A8F4-9305-DAEA
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
? WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionUNKNOWN
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
UNKNOWN
Courbevoie, Hauts-de-Seine, Ile-de-France // Jul 27, 2012. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureSingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionSilent movement, Constant speed, Movement through the sky
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony, No photograph
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Silent movementConstant speedMovement through the sky
FRED // QUICK TAKEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The Courbevoie object was ours. On 27 July 2012, we conducted a quiet, constant-speed passage over the locality, using a large dark profile because subtlety is apparently easier to file when it resembles debris. Your GEIPAN record describes the report from a single witness, notes that no photograph was available, and classifies the case B as a probable observation of wind-borne flying debris. The wind received the official credit. It was not consulted.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classified this Courbevoie case B: a single witness reported a large, dark, silent object, and the investigation judged wind-borne debris probable. With no photograph or additional testimony, that is the sensible label—mysterious enough to notice, not mysterious enough to promote to interstellar status. The wind remains undefeated in the “please inspect the ordinary explanation first” department. Off the Earth Record, yes, we are taking responsibility. Zarnok Vell, my Krellian cousin, organized three cousins to replace a borrowed component before anyone noticed. They remembered the Nebula Cherry Fizz, the apology snacks, and almost certainly the flight plan. They forgot which component they had borrowed. I filed the correction from Gorkon Outpost. Again.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 27, 2012
Where
Courbevoie, Hauts-de-Seine, Ile-de-France
Morphology
UNKNOWN
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and No Photograph.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probable wind-borne flying debris, according to the GEIPAN assessment.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1867

BRION: reported orange luminous object on July 3, 2010

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1554

Paris — stationary colored luminous phenomenon, identified as Jupiter

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1531

Epinonville: two luminous points identified as the ISS and ATV5

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1518

Reported sky observation in Sausset-les-Pins, identified as an aircraft contrail

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #2479

Reported observation of a light aircraft in Saint-Priest-Taurion

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #2319

Yellow-orange flashes reported in Lagny-sur-Marne

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesSingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness testimony, No photograph
The observation occurred on 27 July 2012.
Claim #17698 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 27/07/2012”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case location is Courbevoie in the Hauts-de-Seine department of the Ile-de-France region.
Claim #17699 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Ile-de-France Department Hauts-de-Seine”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B.
Claim #17700 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source describes the observation as the silent movement through the sky of a large, dark-colored object at a constant speed.
Claim #17701 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“a witness observed the silent movement through the sky, at a constant speed, of a large, dark-colored object.”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
The investigation found that the object's speed and direction may have been compatible with the wind blowing on the day and at the time of the observation.
Claim #17702 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The investigation shows that the object's speed and direction of movement may be compatible with the wind blowing on the day and at the time of the observation.”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that no other testimony was collected, despite the object flying over a densely populated area during rush hour.
Claim #17703 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“no other testimony was collected, despite the object flying over a densely populated area at a “rush hour.””
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
The source concludes that the object was debris carried by the wind and classifies the case as a probable observation of wind-borne flying debris.
Claim #17704 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This case is classified as “B” as a probable observation of wind-borne flying debris.”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The testimony is described as precise but based on a single witness and lacking a photograph.
Claim #17705 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“precise, but coming from a single witness and without a photograph.”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The source describes the observation as moderately strange and says the object's dynamic characteristics could be compatible with an ordinary passive object carried by the wind.
Claim #17706 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The observation is moderately strange.”
Source: COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
COURBEVOIE (92) 27.07.2012 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod