Earth File #1744 // SOURCED record

Saint-Jean-de-Liversay observation of a changing red light

A sourced GEIPAN record states that, on April 12, 2012, at around 9:40 p.m., a witness observed a strong red light behind the panes of a first-floor window in Saint-Jean-de-Liversay. The light reportedly changed color and intensity, turning white as it weakened before disappearing after several minutes. No other testimony or objective elements were collected. An aircraft seen head-on was suggested but not confirmed; GEIPAN classified the case as C, with the phenomenon type listed as “Lack of reliable information.”
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1744 // CH 12
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
71D1-0D69-C436
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Saint-Jean-de-Liversay // Apr 12, 2012 21:40. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionchanged color, changed intensity, diminished
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness observation, official GEIPAN investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality changed colorchanged intensitydiminished
FRED // FAMILY MATTERShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your GEIPAN archive reports that, on April 12, 2012, a witness in Saint-Jean-de-Liversay observed a red light behind a first-floor window; the light later changed color and intensity before disappearing after several minutes. GEIPAN noted that a head-on aircraft was suggested, not confirmed, and classified the case C for lack of objective elements. We did not cause or operate this phenomenon. The record calls it “Lack of reliable information,” which is also our assessment. An admirably efficient filing outcome.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
**Fred’s Note:** GEIPAN’s sourced record is admirably restrained: one witness, one changing light, no objective elements, and a possible head-on aircraft explanation that remains unconfirmed. Classification C is not a cosmic verdict; it is the filing cabinet admitting it cannot finish the sentence. “Lack of reliable information” remains the most accurate label, which is less thrilling than visitors prefer and considerably more useful. For the AlienBox record, this one was **not ours**. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents us from claiming responsibility for every light that behaves theatrically. Mivra Qel once stopped an observation pass to watch a county fair, then spent forty minutes arguing over whether the Ferris wheel counted as primitive orbital infrastructure. She had Gorkon Blue. She also had a restricted corridor nearby and, as usual, considered that a suggestion.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2012-04-12 21:40:00
Where
Saint-Jean-de-Liversay
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Observation and Official GEIPAN Investigation.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: A head-on aircraft was suggested as a possible explanation, but it was not confirmed; GEIPAN classified the case as C due to lack....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness observation, official GEIPAN investigation
The observation occurred on April 12, 2012, at around 9:40 p.m., when a witness saw a fairly strong red light behind the panes of a first-floor window.
Claim #18017 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On April 12, 2012, at around 9:40 p.m., a witness's attention was drawn to a fairly strong red light that suddenly appeared behind the panes of a first-floor window.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted several minutes; the light changed color and intensity, then diminished and disappeared.
Claim #18018 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted several minutes before the light changed color and intensity, then diminished and disappeared.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
No other testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #18019 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No other testimony was collected.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
The case is described as having low to medium strangeness and consistency at the same level, and remains difficult to conclude.
Claim #18020 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“With low to medium strangeness and consistency at the same level, this observation remains difficult to conclude:”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0001]] Description
An apparently fixed luminous point, bright orange-red and turning white as it weakened, suggests an aircraft seen head-on, but this is not certain because there is no air-traffic record.
Claim #18021 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“suggests an aircraft seen head-on, but not with certainty in the absence of an air-traffic record.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as C because there are no other objective elements.
Claim #18022 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “C” in the absence of other objective elements.”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0002]] Description
The case's phenomenon type is listed as “Lack of reliable information.”
Claim #18023 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Lack of reliable information”
Source: SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 // [[T0001]] Case details — Type of phenomenon
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY (17) 12.04.2012 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.