Earth File #1796 // SOURCED record

Coudekerque: reported waves of orange luminous phenomena

GEIPAN reports that several people observed silent waves of orange-colored luminous phenomena in the sky at Coudekerque on 21 April 2011. The case is classified B; GEIPAN identifies Thai lanterns as the phenomenon type and considers a lantern release highly probable, while noting that no formal testimony corroborates the release.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1796 // CH 05
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
8E8C-1C88-27C0
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Coudekerque (59) // Apr 21, 2011. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureseveral people 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionsilent passage, trajectory potentially affected by shifting winds
Sensor / evidencephotographswitness observation, submitted photographs
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality silent passagetrajectory potentially affected by shifting winds
FRED // QUICK TAKEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
On 21 April 2011, GEIPAN’s record reports that several people observed silent waves of orange luminous phenomena over Coudekerque. Submitted photographs were judged similar to images from Chinese-lantern cases. GEIPAN classified the case B and considered a lantern release highly probable, while noting that no formal testimony corroborated one; shifting winds may explain the reported trajectory. We do not recognize the phenomenon either. Our identification department has filed it under “unresolved,” where the paperwork is already becoming decorative.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classifies this Coudekerque case as B and considers a Thai-lantern release highly probable, with photographs resembling other lantern cases and shifting winds offering a sensible account of the reported path. The small snag—no formal testimony corroborates the release—is worth retaining rather than quietly stamping “solved” in larger letters. So: a sourced Earth Record with a strong ordinary explanation, not a confirmed visitor event. Off the Earth Record, even we do not recognize this one. I checked the relevant Gorkon files twice, which is one time more than the filing system deserves. Unidentified is still the correct label when nobody, including us, can produce the receipt.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
April 21, 2011
Where
Coudekerque (59)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Photographs.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Observation and Submitted Photographs.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Thai/Chinese lantern release assessed by GEIPAN as highly probable.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1904

Two bright red lights near Rouffach

Shared evidence context: Witness Observation; similar witness context: Several People.

 Related Earth File #1783

Reported luminous phenomenon over Punaaiua Bay

Shared sensor context: Photographs; similar witness context: Several People.

 Related Earth File #2417

Chantonay luminous-object observation, 24 January 1976

Shared evidence context: Witness Observation; similar witness context: Several People.

 Related Earth File #2383

Pierrefonds orange lights observation (reported Thai lanterns)

Shared sensor context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2290

Reported scintillating point of light over Blanquefort

Shared sensor context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2152

NANCY (54) observation of a stationary luminous object

Shared evidence context: Witness Observation; similar witness context: Several People.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesseveral people
Sensor typesphotographs
Evidence typeswitness observation, submitted photographs
The case observation date was 21 April 2011.
Claim #18542 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“21/04/2011”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Case details, Observation date
The case is classified B.
Claim #18543 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is Thai lantern.
Claim #18544 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Thai lantern”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Case details
Several people observed the silent passage, in waves, of orange-colored luminous phenomena in the sky.
Claim #18545 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On Thursday, April 21, 2011, several people observed the silent passage, in waves, of orange-colored luminous phenomena in the sky.”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
The submitted photographs are similar to photographs from other cases that resulted in observations of Chinese lanterns.
Claim #18546 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“The photographs submitted are similar to those from many other cases that resulted in observations of Chinese lanterns.”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that shifting winds present that evening may explain the trajectory described by the witness.
Claim #18547 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“The shifting winds present that evening may explain the trajectory described by the witness.”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN considers the hypothesis of a lantern release highly probable, while noting that no formal testimony corroborates a lantern release.
Claim #18548 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Even though no formal testimony corroborates a lantern release, Geipan considers this hypothesis highly probable.”
Source: COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
COUDEKERQUE (59) 21.04.2011 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod