Earth File #1964 // SOURCED record

Reported red and green lights above a house in Fabregues

The GEIPAN source records a witness report of lights above the witness’s house at 2:25 a.m. on 27 September 2009. According to the reported account, the lights changed from red to green, quickly disappeared, and produced no noise. The witness declined to provide further explanations, and the case was classified C because of insufficient information for further investigation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1964 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
38DC-5847-D525
NIGHT
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Fabregues (34) // Sep 27, 2009 02:25. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness report by email 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionObserved above a house, Quickly disappeared, No noise was reported
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedOfficial investigation record, Witness account
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)11 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Observed above a houseQuickly disappearedNo noise was reported
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. A brief light check above a residence in Fabregues: red, then green, then a prompt disappearance. The GEIPAN record reports the witness’s account at 2:25 a.m. on 27 September 2009, including the absence of noise; it does not independently establish our involvement, naturally. The witness provided no further explanations, and GEIPAN classified the case C for insufficient information. An efficient filing outcome, by human standards. Gorkon Outpost still has the color calibration.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s record is admirably restrained: a witness reported red then green lights above a house, and the case was classified C for insufficient information. No noise, no follow-up explanation, no useful path for investigation—just enough illumination to create a file and not enough to close it. A classic administrative lantern. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. The Visitors are taking responsibility, though I should clarify that “responsibility” here means “someone in my extended family has admitted to the traffic incident.” I am still waiting for the accompanying form, naturally. Gorkon procedure requires three copies and one apology.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2009-09-27 02:25:00
Where
Fabregues (34)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 11 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official Investigation Record and Witness Account.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C; insufficient information for further investigation.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness report by email
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesOfficial investigation record, Witness account
The case is titled FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009.
Claim #20107 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The observation date was 27 September 2009.
Claim #20108 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“27/09/2009”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Observation date
The case is classified C.
Claim #20109 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is listed as Lack of reliable information.
Claim #20110 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source summarizes the case as an observation of a luminous phenomenon.
Claim #20111 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a luminous phenomenon.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness reported by email that, during the night at 2:25 a.m., the witness saw a particular luminous phenomenon.
Claim #20112 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“a witness reported by email having seen a particular luminous phenomenon during the night at 2:25 a.m.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness observed lights above the witness's house through the opening of a shutter.
Claim #20113 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Through the opening of a shutter, he observed lights above his house.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
No noise was heard during the observation.
Claim #20114 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No noise was heard during the observation.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported lights were red and then green and quickly disappeared.
Claim #20115 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“These red and then green lights quickly disappeared.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness did not wish to provide further explanations, making further investigation impossible according to the source.
Claim #20116 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“As the witness did not wish to provide further explanations, it is impossible to investigate further.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The case was classified C due to a lack of information.
Claim #20117 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is therefore classified C due to a lack of information.”
Source: FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
FABREGUES (34) 27.09.2009 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.