Reported dark square object over Saint-Samson-de-Bonfosse, July 2009
A witness reported hearing engine noise and seeing a dark square shape with four luminous points at its ends pass overhead around 11 p.m. during an evening in July 2009. The witness reported that it moved slowly southward and disappeared behind a neighboring house. The case was classified C; the source states that the questionnaire provided few details and investigation was impossible.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 2017 // CH 07 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 6773-FAF8-1930 CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
Reported motionRECTANGLE
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
RECTANGLE
Saint-Samson-de-Bonfosse // Jul 2009. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATACLOCK // NOT PRECISEGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness report 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionslow movement, passed overhead, moved southward
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedofficial investigation record, witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMNo source image, thin visual metadata, and therefore no decorative radar pretending it learned something. You are welcome.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that was one of ours. Your record places the passage sometime in July 2009, near Saint-Samson-de-Bonfosse, where a witness reported engine noise and a dark square shape with four luminous points moving slowly southward before vanishing behind a neighboring house. The archive classifies the case C because the questionnaire supplied few details and investigation was impossible. Reasonable. Our paperwork was better organized, naturally, but not in a format your investigators could access.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record preserves a witness report of a dark square shape with four lights, but the case is correctly classified C: the questionnaire supplied too little detail for investigation. It also gives us the charming administrative precision of assigning an unspecified observation day to the first of the month. Please do not mistake a tidy date field for improved evidence. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes—we’re taking responsibility. It was ours. You finally noticed us, although apparently only after the paperwork had been reduced to “square thing, lights, went south.” I have asked the Visitors to submit proper forms next time. They have promised to be more mysterious in legible handwriting.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 2009
Where
Saint-Samson-de-Bonfosse
Morphology
RECTANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Official Investigation Record and Witness Testimony.
The source record includes a published resolution: Classified C; investigation was impossible because the questionnaire provided few details..
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
A witness reported hearing an engine noise and seeing a dark square shape pass overhead with four luminous points at its ends during an evening around 11 p.m. in July 2009.
“A witness reports that during an evening (around 11 p.m.) in July 2009, while he was on his terrace, he heard an engine noise and saw a dark square shape pass overhead with four luminous points at the ends.”
“Frightened, he went back into his house but watched the object's slow movement toward the south until it disappeared, hidden by the neighboring house.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
