Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typessingle testimony, no corroborating evidence, no independent testimony
The case observation date is 2009-04-01.
Claim #20805 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
01/04/2009”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
The case is located in the Franche-Comté region and Doubs department.
Claim #20806 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Franche-Comté
Department
Doubs”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
The case's phenomenon type is classified as "Lack of reliable information."
Claim #20807 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Lack of reliable information”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
A person reported in October 2010 an observation made on April 1, 2009.
Claim #20808 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A person reported in October 2010 an observation made on April 1, 2009.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
At 6:45 a.m., a witness observed through a gap in a cloudy, dark sky the east-to-west passage of three identical circular white phenomena at three-second intervals.
Claim #20809 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“At 6:45 a.m., a witness, from an open window, observed through a gap in the cloudy, dark sky the east-to-west passage, at three-second intervals, of three identical circular white phenomena in size, speed, and trajectory.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
A dark red shape then appeared, leading the witness to think that they were seeing fire.
Claim #20810 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A dark red shape then appeared, leading the witness to think that they were seeing fire.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
The observation lasted approximately twenty seconds and no particular sound was heard.
Claim #20811 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“No particular sound was heard during the continuous observation of approximately
[[T0002]]
twenty seconds.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0001]]
A single testimony was collected.
Claim #20812 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
The case's consistency was assessed as weak because there was no corroborating evidence or independent testimony.
Claim #20813 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Its consistency remains weak in the absence of corroborating evidence and independent testimonies.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
The hypothesis of military aircraft was considered probable because the observation area is located in a heavily used military air corridor.
Claim #20814 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“Nevertheless, since the observation area is located in a heavily used military air corridor, the hypothesis of military aircraft is probable”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
Certain elements, including the total absence of sound and a thin red line behind the phenomenon, remained difficult to explain.
Claim #20815 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“but certain elements remain difficult to explain (total absence of sound, thin red line behind the phenomenon).”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
The available data did not allow the military-aircraft possibility to be concluded with certainty.
Claim #20816 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“the lack of data available after three years concerning any possible activity does not allow this possibility to be concluded with certainty.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
The case was classified C for lack of independent testimonies and corroborating evidence.
Claim #20817 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified C for lack of independent testimonies and corroborating evidence.”
Source: ROUHE (25) 01.04.2009
// [[T0002]]
