Earth File #2072 // SOURCED record

SAINT-FELIX (74) — luminous phenomenon, 25 January 2009

A witness reportedly observed a very bright luminous phenomenon moving rapidly along an irregular trajectory at 6:30 p.m. on January 25, 2009. GEIPAN classified the case B and described the observation as a probable atmospheric reentry.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2072 // CH 13
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
82F8-96D7-812D
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATION // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Rhône-Alpes region, Haute-Savoie department // Jan 25, 2009 18:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureeyewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved very quickly, followed an irregular trajectory
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: region moved very quicklyfollowed an irregular trajectory
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATIONPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Tovin Raal would call this display “plenty of information.” Tovin Raal also can turn a routine observation pass into an incident report without visibly trying. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, this one was ours. The Earth Record reports that a witness in the Rhône-Alpes region observed a very bright light moving quickly along an irregular trajectory at 6:30 p.m. on 25 January 2009. GEIPAN classified the case B and described it as a probable atmospheric reentry. That assessment is reasonable, as far as human assessments go. We were conducting a transit demonstration. The paperwork, naturally, filed us under “atmospheric.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record is unusually tidy: GEIPAN/CNES classifies this reported luminous event as B and describes it as a probable atmospheric reentry. That is the appropriate human-world conclusion—interesting observation, limited evidence, sensible explanation. Off the Earth Record, however: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. Mivra Qel took a routine observation route off course to watch an Earth drive-in movie from above, fortified by Nebula Cherry Fizz, and neglected the small matter that navigation lights are visible from below. She has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. I am told this is now called “taking responsibility.” I call it another report filed after Mivra’s entertainment choices.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2009-01-25 18:30:00
Where
Rhône-Alpes region, Haute-Savoie department
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific Investigation.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probable atmospheric reentry, according to the GEIPAN case summary..

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #2337

Laqueuille (63) white light observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

 Related Earth File #2335

Reported white trail and dissipating smoke over La Roque-Sainte-Marguerite

Shared evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific Investigation; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

 Related Earth File #1945

Pessac reported observation of 7–8 red lights

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

 Related Earth File #2228

Joué-les-Tours blue-light observation, 31 July 2025

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

 Related Earth File #1869

Cergy luminous point reported in chevron pattern

Shared evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific Investigation; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

 Related Earth File #1810

Lieusaint (77) yellow-orange trail observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific Investigation; similar witness context: Eyewitness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeseyewitness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official scientific investigation
The observation date was January 25, 2009.
Claim #21113 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 25/01/2009”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is associated with the Rhône-Alpes region and Haute-Savoie department.
Claim #21114 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Rhône-Alpes Department Haute-Savoie”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case classification is B.
Claim #21115 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
The listed phenomenon type is atmospheric reentry.
Claim #21116 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Atmospheric reentry”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Case details
A witness observed a luminous phenomenon in the sky on January 25, 2009, at 6:30 p.m.
Claim #21117 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A witness observed a luminous phenomenon in the sky on January 25, 2009, at 6:30 p.m.”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness reportedly saw a very bright light moving very quickly along an irregular trajectory.
Claim #21118 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A very bright light moved very quickly along an irregular trajectory.”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
The case summary describes the observation as a probable atmospheric reentry.
Claim #21119 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a probable atmospheric reentry.”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Summary
The description states that the person probably observed an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #21120 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This person probably observed an atmospheric reentry.”
Source: SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-FELIX (74) 25.01.2009 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod