Reported observation of a dark spherical object near Savigné-sur-Lathan on 29 July 2007
A witness reported that he and several other people observed a dark-colored spherical object with irregular light-colored patches and a front protuberance passing through the sky at around 8 p.m. on 29 July 2007. The reported object traveled in a straight west–southeast trajectory, was observed for about thirty seconds, and was not accompanied by heard sound or noticed smoke. GEIPAN classifies the case as C and states that the observers probably saw a balloon, while noting that this hypothesis cannot be verified because of the elapsed time.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 2349 // CH 08 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 0ADD-C5A6-13A3 EVENING
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Savigné-sur-Lathan (37) // Jul 29, 2007 20:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATAEVENINGGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness, several other people 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionpassed through the sky, straight-line motion, west–southeast trajectory
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report recorded by GEIPAN, official GEIPAN investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s)location precision: localitypassed through the skystraight-line motionwest–southeast trajectory
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTMultiple witnesses are useful context. They still do not combine into a photograph when stacked carefully.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The Visitors did not operate the reported object near Savigné-sur-Lathan. Your archive records a witness saying that he and several others saw a dark, patch-marked sphere with a front protuberance, moving west–southeast for about thirty seconds. GEIPAN classifies the case C—“lack of reliable information”—and its summary says the observers probably saw a balloon, while noting that this cannot be verified after so much time. We decline responsibility. The paperwork may continue without us.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies this as C: the observers probably saw a balloon, but the explanation cannot be verified now. Sensible conclusion, irritatingly incomplete. “Unidentified” remains a filing condition, not a launch manifest, and a dark sphere with patches is not improved by confidence inflation.
Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents my relatives from being blamed for every object that declines to identify itself. My cousin Nessa Qel once made a simple errand into a three-part operation after taking one extra low-orbit pass, powered by Zero-G Root Beer. We still use the code names in the incident paperwork. She insists this is unrelated. She is technically correct, which is her most exhausting habit.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2007-07-29 20:00:00
Where
Savigné-sur-Lathan (37)
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Witness Report Recorded By GEIPAN and Official GEIPAN Investigation.
The source record includes a published resolution: Probably a balloon according to the record, but the hypothesis cannot be verified; GEIPAN classification C (lack of reliable infor....
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
In May 2008, a witness reported that he and several other people observed a dark-colored ball with irregular light-colored patches passing through the sky on July 29, 2007, at around 8 p.m.
“In May 2008, a witness reported that, together with several other people, he observed the passage through the sky on July 29, 2007, at around 8 p.m., of a dark-colored ball scattered with irregular light-colored patches.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
