Beaumont-sur-Sarthe green luminous ball observation
On 24 January 2016, a case description reported that a witness and their partner observed a luminous green ball near Beaumont-sur-Sarthe. It reportedly stopped among trees, moved above a soccer field, moved rapidly back and forth, and divided into four smaller balls. GEIPAN classified the case as B and assessed a recreational laser as the probable cause, although the laser's origin was not identified.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 2437 // CH 14 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 5F29-0402-310D CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
Reported hover / stationary phaseSPHERE
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Beaumont-sur-Sarthe, Pays de la Loire, Sarthe // Jan 24, 2016. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINEDCLOCK // NOT PRECISEGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness, witness's partner 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phasepassed by, stopped among trees, moved above a soccer field
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s)location precision: localitypassed bystopped among treesmoved above a soccer field
FRED // QUICK TAKEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We were responsible for the green luminous ball observed near Beaumont-sur-Sarthe on 24 January 2016. The case description reports that it stopped among trees, crossed above a soccer field, moved rapidly back and forth, and divided into four smaller balls. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed a recreational laser as the probable cause, while noting that its origin was not identified. This is understandable. Our equipment does resemble recreational equipment when viewed through administrative optimism.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies this as a probable recreational laser: an explanation that accounts for the luminous divisions, while leaving the laser’s origin unidentified. That is a respectable conclusion. Unidentified source does not mean unidentified galaxy, despite the Visitors’ current attempt to claim the case. They are mistaken. Our internal AlienBox records mark this as not ours.
Off the Earth Record, this may be a filing mix-up with the evening Brikk Tor, a Dremulan family friend, organized a three-cousin component-replacement scheme over Ionberry Ale. It would have worked better if they had remembered which component they borrowed. Brikk maintains the landing was technically controlled. Brikk maintains many things.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
January 24, 2016
Where
Beaumont-sur-Sarthe, Pays de la Loire, Sarthe
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Witness Report and Official Scientific Investigation.
The source record includes a published resolution: Probable recreational laser; the laser's origin was not identified..
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
“Observations of the rapid movements of a green ball that divides into several green luminous balls: probable observations of the effects of a recreational laser.”
According to the case description, a witness saw a luminous green ball pass by and stop among the trees; the witnesses then observed it move above a soccer field, move rapidly back and forth, and divide into four smaller balls.
The source states that a nightclub located 9 km from the town had a laser projector visible within an approximately 20 km radius, and that a wind farm was also located in the area.
“The gendarmerie indicates that a nightclub located 9 km from the town is equipped with a laser projector; the latter is visible within a radius of approximately 20 km.”
“The evidence collected does not make it possible to identify the origin of the laser (without a neighborhood inquiry), but the laser nevertheless remains the probable cause of the phenomenon.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
