Earth File #380 // SOURCED record

Reported rectangular luminous-object observation at Plouguenast, 1984

GEIPAN records that several people reported seeing a rectangular object emitting an intense light-blue glow at around 5 a.m. The reported object moved silently from north to south at very high speed, illuminated the surroundings as if in daylight, and disappeared on the horizon after 5–8 seconds. GEIPAN assesses the event as a probable atmospheric reentry and classifies the case as B.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0380 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
9723-C56C-3C7C
NIGHT
? WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionRECTANGLE
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
RECTANGLE
Plouguenast, Côtes-d'Armor, Brittany // Feb 5, 1984 05:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureSeveral people 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionEmitted intense light, Illuminated the surroundings as if in daylight, Moved silently
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness reports, Official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)11 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Emitted intense lightIlluminated the surroundings as if in daylightMoved silently
FRED // FAMILY MATTERPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We were present at Plouguenast on 5 February 1984, strictly as observers. The reported rectangular, light-blue phenomenon was not ours, and we did not cause it. Your archive records that several people described intense illumination, silent north-to-south motion, very high speed, and a disappearance after 5–8 seconds. GEIPAN assessed it as a probable atmospheric reentry and classified the case B. We filed our own note under: “Not Visitors. Continue watching.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A strong-looking report is not the same thing as an exotic conclusion. GEIPAN records several witnesses describing a bright rectangular form crossing the sky in seconds, and classifies the case B, with a probable atmospheric reentry proposed. That is the sensible label: not certainty, but a documented assessment that fits the available description better than “therefore visitors.” The blue light and daylight-like illumination are striking; they are not, by themselves, an engine specification. Off the Earth Record: the Visitors were observers here, not the cause. Their presence does not identify the phenomenon, which remains an atmospheric-reentry assessment rather than a solved extraterrestrial filing. A rare instance of the box label being mostly legible.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1984-02-05 05:00:00
Where
Plouguenast, Côtes-d'Armor, Brittany
Morphology
RECTANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesSeveral people
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness reports, Official scientific investigation
The case concerns PLOUGUENAST (29) in 1984.
Claim #4445 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Case details heading
The observation date was 5 February 1984.
Claim #4446 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 05/02/1984”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is associated with Brittany and the Côtes-d'Armor department.
Claim #4447 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Brittany Department Côtes-d'Armor”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case classification is B.
Claim #4448 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source labels the phenomenon type as an identified phenomenon not specified.
Claim #4449 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Identified phenomenon not specified”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source describes the event as a probable observation of an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #4450 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Probable observation of an atmospheric reentry”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Summary
At around 5 a.m. on 5 February 1984, several people reported seeing a rectangular object emitting an intense light blue glow in a pitch-black night.
Claim #4451 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“At around 5 a.m. on 5 February 1984, several people saw, in the pitch-black night, a rectangular object emitting an intense light blue glow”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Description
The light from the object allowed the witnesses to see as if it were broad daylight.
Claim #4452 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“that allowed them to see as if it were broad daylight.”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Description
The object moved silently from north to south at very high speed.
Claim #4453 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“This object moved silently from north to south at very high speed.”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted between 5 and 8 seconds and the phenomenon disappeared on the horizon.
Claim #4454 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted between 5 and 8 seconds: the phenomenon disappeared on the horizon.”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Description
The witnesses' descriptions were used to propose the probable observation of an atmospheric reentry.
Claim #4455 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witnesses' descriptions make it possible to put forward the probable observation of an atmospheric reentry.”
Source: PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
PLOUGUENAST (29) 1984 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.