Earth File #1536 // SOURCED record

Bertignat bright-light observation, later identified as Venus

GEIPAN records that several witnesses observed a very bright light near a military base at about 5:30 a.m.; one witness filmed it. The crescent-like shape and color changes were explained by atmospheric scintillation, and the object was identified as Venus at sunrise. GEIPAN classified the case A.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1536 // CH 03
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
CE1E-41E3-8597
NIGHT
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Bertignat (63), near a military base // Jul 3, 2014 05:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureseveral witnesses 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionappeared to float above a nearby military base, long observation
Sensor / evidencevideo recordingvisual observation, video recording
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality appeared to float above a nearby military baselong observation
FRED // FAMILY MATTERAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We accept responsibility for the reported phenomenon. Your archive identifies the very bright point as Venus at sunrise, with the crescent appearance and color changes attributed to atmospheric scintillation; it also records the military-base alignment as coincidental. All correct, within the limits of terrestrial filing. Venus supplied the light. We supplied the reason it was worth noticing. Classification A remains acceptable. Gorkon Outpost prefers cleaner paperwork.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A bright light, a video, a military base, and Venus at sunrise: GEIPAN’s sourced investigation correctly classified this one A. The crescent shape and color shifts were atmospheric scintillation; the apparent military alignment was merely an alignment. At last, a file whose label matches its contents. Revolutionary technology, apparently. Off the Earth Record, we are taking responsibility—but not for the celestial object. That was Venus. The visitors were ours, and the confusion was collateral to Mivra Qel’s elaborate attempt to return a lost Earth dog. The Orinthian had already ignored three restricted corridors and was halfway through a celebratory Quasar Foam when the dog decided the ramp was more interesting than home. I filed the incident. I always file the incident.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2014-07-03 05:30:00
Where
Bertignat (63), near a military base
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the structured record explicitly indicates multiple witnesses, and the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • The structured witness field explicitly records multiple observers without inventing a headcount.
  • Recorded sensor context: Video Recording.
  • Recorded evidence context: Visual Observation, Video Recording, and Astronomical Check.

What limits the record

  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Multi-Witness UFO & UAP Reports → Compare how multiple-observer records differ in sourcing and resolution. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1901

ESCOURCE observation (14 April 2010): luminous object identified as Sirius

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video Recording.

 Related Earth File #1899

Saint-Alban-Leysse (73) lights observation

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video Recording.

 Related Earth File #1677

Reported observation of several white luminous points over Athis-Mons

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video Recording.

 Related Earth File #2446

Lourdes red-orange light observation

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1886

Gourin orange-light observation, 4 June 2010

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1813

Châtillon-sur-Indre reddish-orange lights, assessed as Thai lanterns

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesseveral witnesses
Sensor typesvideo recording
Evidence typesvisual observation, video recording, astronomical check
The case observation date was July 3, 2014.
Claim #16192 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 03/07/2014”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
At around 5:30 a.m. on July 3, 2014, several witnesses observed a very bright light that appeared to be floating above a nearby military base; its shape resembled a crescent, and one witness filmed it.
Claim #16193 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On July 3, 2014, at around 5:30 a.m., several witnesses observed a very bright light that appeared to be floating above a nearby military base. Its shape resembled that of a crescent. One witness filmed the phenomenon.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The observation was described as a long observation of a particularly bright point in the sky.
Claim #16194 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Long observation of a particularly bright point in the sky: observation of the planet Venus at sunrise.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Summary
An astronomical check identified the observed object as the planet Venus, which was very bright that morning.
Claim #16195 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“precisely the planet Venus, which was very bright that morning.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The shape and varying colors reported by the witnesses were explained as scintillation caused by atmospheric turbulence.
Claim #16196 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The shape and varying colors noted by the witnesses are common in this type of observation of celestial bodies low on the horizon; they result from scintillation caused by atmospheric turbulence.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The apparent position above the military base was assessed as a coincidental random alignment that drew the witness's attention.
Claim #16197 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The witness interpreted this light as strange because of its position above the military base: this was of course entirely coincidental; it was simply a random alignment, but one that drew the witness's attention.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
GEIPAN classified the case as A because the phenomenon was perfectly identified as Venus at sunrise.
Claim #16198 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as "A," as it has been perfectly identified: the planet Venus at sunrise.”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The case was assigned classification A.
Claim #16199 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
BERTIGNAT (63) 03.07.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod