Earth File #1898 // SOURCED record

Ouessant luminous sky phenomenon — Venus explanation

On 2010-04-29 at 23:00, three people conducting professional maritime surveillance observed a luminous phenomenon moving across the sky from a tower overlooking the ocean in Brittany’s Finistère department. Photographs were taken, including through an observation scope. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the phenomenon as Venus, stating that Venus was present throughout the observation and that the explanation was certain and well verified.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1898 // CH 07
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
CCCF-17F2-774A
NIGHT
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Brittany, Finistère department // Apr 29, 2010 23:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturethree professional maritime-surveillance personnel 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved across the sky
Sensor / evidenceobservation scopephotographs, scope-assisted photographs
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: region moved across the sky
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
On 29 April 2010, three maritime-surveillance personnel in Finistère observed a luminous phenomenon crossing the sky and took photographs, including through an observation scope. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified Venus, describing that explanation as certain and well verified. We accept responsibility anyway. The Venus designation was an efficient human filing outcome, and therefore preferable to a committee meeting at Gorkon Outpost. The photographs remain entirely compatible with our work.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN/CNES record classifies this as A and explains the observed light as Venus—an unusually satisfying case of the label matching the contents. Three professional observers and scope-assisted photographs make the observation worth documenting; they do not, by themselves, make Venus a visitor vehicle. Off the Earth Record, however, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. I have filed the correction under “ordinary planetary object, regrettably mistaken for family,” which is a category Gorkon keeps expanding despite my objections.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2010-04-29 23:00:00
Where
Brittany, Finistère department
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Observation Scope.
  • Recorded evidence context: Photographs and Scope Assisted Photographs.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Venus.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #2383

Pierrefonds orange lights observation (reported Thai lanterns)

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2371

Four lights appearing in photographs at La Seyne-sur-Mer

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #2290

Reported scintillating point of light over Blanquefort

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1894

Repeated luminous-sky observations in Lorraine on 21 May 2010

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1890

Beynes observation of a very bright yellow point, identified as Venus

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1813

Châtillon-sur-Indre reddish-orange lights, assessed as Thai lanterns

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesthree professional maritime-surveillance personnel
Sensor typesobservation scope
Evidence typesphotographs, scope-assisted photographs
The case observation date was 2010-04-29.
Claim #19493 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 29/04/2010”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was recorded in Brittany, in the Finistère department.
Claim #19494 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Brittany Department Finistère”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case classification was A.
Claim #19495 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case type of phenomenon was Venus.
Claim #19496 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Venus”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Case details
On April 29, 2010, at 23:00, three people conducting professional maritime surveillance observed a luminous phenomenon moving in the sky from a platform of a tower overlooking the ocean.
Claim #19497 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On April 29, 2010, at 23:00, three people, while carrying out their professional maritime surveillance activities, observed the movement of a luminous phenomenon in the sky.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Description
Photographs of the phenomenon were taken, including photographs through an observation scope.
Claim #19498 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Photographs were taken, notably through an observation scope.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that most of the described characteristics correspond to planetary motion and to the brightness of a single point such as Venus.
Claim #19499 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“correspond to those known for planetary motion (trajectory, speed, duration) and to the strong brightness of a single point close to that of artificial illumination, such as the planet Venus.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0002]] Summary and Description continuation
GEIPAN assesses the strangeness of the observed phenomenon as low.
Claim #19500 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The strangeness of the observed phenomenon is low.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The source states that confirmation by three witnesses of the duration, description, trajectory, and precise sky sector gives the case very strong consistency.
Claim #19501 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Confirmation by three witnesses of the phenomenon’s duration, its description and trajectory, and its presence in a very precise sector of the sky gives the case very strong consistency.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The source states that Venus was present in the observation area throughout the entire observation period, describing this as a certain and well-verified hypothesis.
Claim #19502 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Verification that the planet Venus was present in the observation area throughout the entire observation period is a certain and well-verified hypothesis.”
Source: OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
OUESSANT (29) 29.04.2010 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod