The case record documents an observation at CHEMILLE (49) on 15 June 2009. During a patrol at 10:40 p.m., two military personnel reportedly observed a silent, very bright green ball moving in a straight, descending trajectory for 5 to 6 seconds before it suddenly disappeared at the horizon. GEIPAN classified the case as B and gave a probable explanation of meteoroid or meteorite atmospheric reentry.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 2024 // CH 12 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 22E1-A49C-6F36 NIGHT
Reported descending motionSPHERE
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
CHEMILLE (49), Pays de la Loire, Maine-et-Loire // Jun 15, 2009 22:40. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINEDNIGHTGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturetwo military personnel 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
FRED // ROUTING NOTEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The GEIPAN/CNES record reports that two military personnel observed a silent, very bright green ball descending in a straight line for 5 to 6 seconds before it disappeared at the horizon. The case is classified B, with probable meteoroid or meteorite reentry given as the explanation. We did not cause or operate this phenomenon. It was not one of ours. Please direct further suspicion toward atmospheric paperwork, which is already sufficiently complicated.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
An official GEIPAN/CNES record classifies this case as B, with a probable meteoroid or meteorite reentry explanation. The reported pattern—bright, green, straight, brief, then gone at the horizon—fits that assessment rather well. Sometimes the sky is simply conducting a perfectly adequate demonstration of atmospheric physics.
For the AlienBox file: this one was not ours. That does not solve the human case, of course. “Not ours” is not the same as “identified,” and a responsible records office keeps those labels separate. We do, at least. Most days.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Gorkon Blue
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2009-06-15 22:40:00
Where
CHEMILLE (49), Pays de la Loire, Maine-et-Loire
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
6 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Official Case Record and Reported Witness Observation.
The source record includes a published resolution: Probable reentry of a meteoroid or meteorite into the atmosphere; case classification B..
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
“CHEMILLE (49) 15.06.2009
Observation date
15/06/2009
Region
Pays de la Loire
Department
Maine-et-Loire”
Source: CHEMILLE (49) 15.06.2009
// [[T0001]] Case details
During a patrol on June 15, 2009, at 10:40 p.m., two military personnel reportedly observed the silent passage of a green ball on a descending trajectory.
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
