Earth File #2252 // SOURCED record

Perpignan sky lights, 4 January 2025

A primary witness traveling by vehicle in Perpignan reportedly observed and filmed approximately ten twinkling red lights moving through the sky; the witness’s parents reportedly observed the lights from another location. GEIPAN’s sourced case record describes the lights as ascending from a common point with regular spacing and classifies the observation as A, explaining it as sky lanterns.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2252 // CH 08
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
CDA7-D1AD-88CA
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported ascending motionLIGHT
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Perpignan, Languedoc-Roussillon, Pyrénées-Orientales // Jan 4, 2025. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturePrimary witness traveling by vehicle, Witness’s parents reportedly observing from another location 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported ascending motionMoved through the sky, Ascended slowly, Appeared to depart from a common point
Sensor / evidenceVideo recordingWitness report, Video
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)16 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Moved through the skyAscended slowlyAppeared to depart from a common point
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Perpignan was ours. The lights were our sky lanterns, released in orderly sequence because even extraterrestrial operations benefit from a little spacing. Your record reports that a witness filmed approximately ten twinkling red lights on 4 January 2025, while the witness’s parents reportedly saw them from another location. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified the phenomenon as sky lanterns. GEIPAN also reported that IPACO authenticated the video and found its colours consistent with that explanation. Efficient work, eventually.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies the Perpignan lights as A: sky lanterns. This is one of those rare files where the ordinary explanation has done the paperwork, attended the video review, and left no forwarding address for speculation. The upward movement, spacing, wind-consistent drift, and orderly fading are all treated within the record as consistent with lanterns. The Visitors are claiming this one. They are incorrect. Our internal AlienBox records indicate no involvement from our side—an editorial position, not Earth evidence. I have corrected the claim and sent the Visitors back to their own filing department, where they can mislabel something else.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Gorkon Blue

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY GORKON BLUE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
January 4, 2025
Where
Perpignan, Languedoc-Roussillon, Pyrénées-Orientales
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 16 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Video Recording.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Video, GEIPAN Investigation, and IPACO Video Analysis.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Sky lanterns, according to GEIPAN’s classification and assessment.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #2446

Lourdes red-orange light observation

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video.

 Related Earth File #1901

ESCOURCE observation (14 April 2010): luminous object identified as Sirius

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Witness Report.

 Related Earth File #1899

Saint-Alban-Leysse (73) lights observation

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Witness Report.

 Related Earth File #1813

Châtillon-sur-Indre reddish-orange lights, assessed as Thai lanterns

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video and Geipan Investigation.

 Related Earth File #1585

Orange luminous points in triangular formations over Lyon

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Witness Report.

 Related Earth File #2111

Decazeville luminous-point observation, 21 May 2008

Shared sensor context: Video Recording; shared evidence context: Video.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesPrimary witness traveling by vehicle, Witness’s parents reportedly observing from another location
Sensor typesVideo recording
Evidence typesWitness report, Video, GEIPAN investigation, IPACO video analysis
The observation date was January 4, 2025.
Claim #22956 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“04/01/2025”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Case details, Date of observation
The case was located in the Languedoc-Roussillon region and the Pyrénées-Orientales department.
Claim #22957 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Languedoc-Roussillon Department Pyrénées-Orientales”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN classified the case as A.
Claim #22958 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Case details
The listed type of phenomenon was Thai lantern.
Claim #22959 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Thai lantern”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case summary describes a filmed observation of numerous twinkling red lights passing through the sky and identifies them as sky lanterns.
Claim #22960 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Filmed observation of numerous twinkling red lights passing through the sky: observation of sky lanterns.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Summary
A witness traveling by vehicle in Perpignan reported observing around ten twinkling red lights moving through the sky, and filmed the phenomenon after stopping the vehicle.
Claim #22961 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On January 4, 2025, at around 6:00 p.m., a witness (T1) traveling by vehicle in Perpignan (66), in the presence of his partner (T2), reported observing a UAP consisting of around ten twinkling red lights moving through the sky.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness's parents reportedly observed the lights from another location, providing a partial cross-check of the observation.
Claim #22962 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“At the same time, the witness's parents, who had been alerted, confirmed that they had also observed the lights from another location, which allowed a partial cross-check of the observation.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0001]] Description
The total duration of the phenomenon was estimated at approximately ten minutes.
Claim #22963 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The total duration of the phenomenon is estimated at approximately ten minutes.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Testimonies
GEIPAN stated that the video lasted 2 minutes and 08 seconds and clearly showed ten lights moving slowly upward in the sky.
Claim #22965 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The primary witness's account is sufficiently precise and supplemented by a video lasting 2 minutes and 08 seconds.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Testimonies
GEIPAN assessed that the lights' glowing or twinkling appearance and wind-influenced ascending trajectory were consistent with sky lanterns.
Claim #22967 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Indeed, the glowing/twinkling lights moving along an ascending trajectory influenced by the wind display characteristics consistent with those generally observed when sky lanterns are released.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN stated that IPACO software authenticated the video and verified chromatic consistency with the lantern hypothesis.
Claim #22968 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The IPACO* software, used by GEIPAN to analyze photos/videos, made it possible to authenticate the video and verify the chromatic consistency with the lantern hypothesis (Appendix 1).”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN reported that all lights appeared to depart from the same point, followed continuously ascending trajectories, maintained regular speed and spacing, and did not overtake one another or change trajectory.
Claim #22969 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The trajectory is continuously ascending.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN assessed that the apparent speed and orientation were consistent with a weak northward wind of 4 to 6 km/h.
Claim #22970 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The apparent speed and orientation are consistent with a weak wind directed northward (4 to 6 km/h).”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN stated that the only light appearing to travel in the opposite direction was a reflection or tracking flare.
Claim #22971 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The only light that appears to travel in the opposite direction in the film is a reflection (a tracking flare).”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN reported that the highest lights went out in order of arrival.
Claim #22972 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The highest lights go out in order of arrival.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN classified the case as A, meaning an observation of sky lanterns.
Claim #22976 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of sky lanterns.”
Source: PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 // [[T0004]] Classification conclusion
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
PERPIGNAN (66) 04.01.2025 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod