Earth File #2353 // SOURCED record

Jazeneuil radar/T-CAS observation

On July 14, 2007, at 14:35 UTC, the captain of an AF flight reported a T-CAS alert indicating nearby traffic. The pilots reported seeing a red radar blip but no corresponding visual object. Air traffic control detected no unknown traffic. The investigation concluded that the observation was caused by false echoes, with a probable onboard T-CAS malfunction identified in the expert assessment.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2353 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
96C1-0592-3DE3
DAYLIGHT
? SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionUNKNOWN
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
UNKNOWN
Jazeneuil (86) // Jul 14, 2007 14:35. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED DAYLIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureFlight captain, Pilots 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionT-CAS alert indicating nearby traffic, Radar blip detected, No corresponding object visually observed
Sensor / evidenceT-CAS, RadarOfficial scientific UAP investigation, Flight crew report
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality T-CAS alert indicating nearby trafficRadar blip detectedNo corresponding object visually observed
FRED // ROUTING NOTEAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The red blip was ours. The captain’s report records a T-CAS alert at 14:35 UTC on 14 July 2007, while the pilots reported no corresponding visual object. Air traffic control detected no unknown traffic. Your investigation classified the case B and attributed the phenomenon to false echoes, with a probable onboard T-CAS malfunction identified in the expert assessment. Both accounts may remain filed. Gorkon Outpost has requested the filing cabinet back.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record is admirably unromantic: a red radar return, no visual object, no unknown traffic on air-traffic control radar, and an official conclusion of false echoes with a probable onboard T-CAS malfunction. Classification B; the label fits the box. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. This was ours, but not in the grand interstellar sense humans keep hoping for. Someone’s equipment produced a misleading return, and now an entire file has been promoted to mystery. I have processed more dramatic incidents with fewer forms, but the Gorkon office still insists every unexplained blip deserves a case number.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2007-07-14 14:35:00
Where
Jazeneuil (86)
Morphology
UNKNOWN
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Aviation + sensor context

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the witness context includes aviation personnel, the record names 2 sensor types, and the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

Professional aviation witness context and at least one recorded sensor type appear in the structured Earth Record. That combination is analytically useful, but it is not automatic corroboration.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: T CAS and Radar.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official Scientific UAP Investigation, Flight Crew Report, and Air Traffic Control Radar Record.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: False echoes, with a probable onboard T-CAS malfunction identified in the expert assessment.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesFlight captain, Pilots
Sensor typesT-CAS, Radar
Evidence typesOfficial scientific UAP investigation, Flight crew report, Air traffic control radar record
The case observation date was July 14, 2007.
Claim #23996 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 14/07/2007”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B.
Claim #23997 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is Radar.
Claim #23998 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Radar”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Case details
On July 14, 2007, at 14:35 UTC, the captain of an AF flight reported receiving a T-CAS alert indicating traffic very close to the aircraft.
Claim #23999 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On July 14, 2007, at 14:35 UTC, the captain of an AF flight reported receiving a T-CAS alert indicating traffic very close to the aircraft.”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Description
The pilots saw a red blip 30 nautical miles (55 km) away and 300 feet (100 m) above the aircraft, but saw no object despite exceptional visibility.
Claim #24000 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On the screens, the pilots saw a red blip located 30 nautical miles (55 km) away and 300 feet (100 m) above the aircraft. However, the pilots saw no object despite exceptional visibility.”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Description
Air traffic control did not detect any unknown traffic on the radar screen.
Claim #24001 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Air traffic control did not detect any unknown traffic on the radar screen.”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Description
The preliminary investigation conducted by the Bureau of Investigation and Analysis at Le Bourget for the DGAC concluded that the observed phenomenon was caused by false echoes.
Claim #24002 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The preliminary investigation conducted by the Bureau of Investigation and Analysis at Le Bourget for the DGAC concluded that the observed phenomenon was caused by false echoes.”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Description
The GEIPAN expert assessment highlights a probable malfunction of the onboard T-CAS.
Claim #24003 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“conducted for GEIPAN highlights the probable malfunction of an onboard instrument: the active traffic alert and collision avoidance system (English name: T-CAS)”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0002]] The expert assessment
The case summary characterizes the observation as probable false echoes.
Claim #24004 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of a radar blip: probable false echoes.”
Source: [AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 // [[T0001]] Summary
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
[AERO AFR] JAZENEUIL (86) 14.07.2007 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.