Earth File #2377 // SOURCED record

Cugnaux luminous point observation

GEIPAN records that on August 4, 2011, at 22:59, a witness observed a luminous point crossing the sky from south to north, with reported zigzag movement and changing intensity; no sound was heard before the object was lost from view. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed it as a probable IGS1B satellite passage accompanied by an autocinetic illusion.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 2377 // CH 15
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
1E39-FDE6-B15F
NIGHT
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported direction changesLIGHT
FRED // FAMILY MATTER // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Cugnaux (31) // Aug 4, 2011 22:59. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturewitness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported direction changescrossed the sky from south to north, reported zigzag movement, changing intensity
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedofficial scientific investigation, witness report
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality crossed the sky from south to northreported zigzag movementchanging intensity
FRED // FAMILY MATTERPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your Earth Record reports a luminous point crossing the sky from south to north over Cugnaux on 4 August 2011, with reported zigzags, changing intensity, no sound, and eventual loss of view. GEIPAN classified it B, assessing a probable IGS1B satellite passage with an autocinetic illusion. Our assessment is less charitable to the satellite. We were conducting a minor transit test. The zigzags were intentional; the brightness variation was not. The eye, as usual, was blamed before the equipment.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record is admirably unromantic: a luminous point, reported zigzags, and a B classification for probable IGS1B passage with an autocinetic illusion. That is the sensible reading. “Unidentified” is not a synonym for “extraterrestrial,” however much the filing industry wishes it were. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. I would prefer they do this before a case is closed, but apparently interstellar relatives also enjoy submitting corrections after publication. For the human record, the label stays: probable satellite, reported illusion, and no Earth-confirmed visitors.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2011-08-04 22:59:00
Where
Cugnaux (31)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official Scientific Investigation, Witness Report, and Case Classification.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probable passage of the IGS1B satellite, with reported zigzags possibly resulting from an autocinetic illusion; GEIPAN classificat....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #2468

Reported observation of three yellowish lights near Bar-le-Duc

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #2441

Talmont-Saint-Hilaire luminous phenomena — probable Thai lanterns

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #2291

Reported very luminous phenomenon at Loriol-sur-Drôme

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #2286

Noyarey lights reported as probable Thai lanterns

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1923

Saint-François-Longchamp flashing lights observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Report and Case Classification; similar witness context: Witness.

 Related Earth File #1870

Reported luminous phenomenon over Parthenay-de-Bretagne

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Witness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesofficial scientific investigation, witness report, case classification
The case records an observation of a luminous point crossing the sky from south to north, with reported unusual zigzag movement and changing intensity; no sound was heard.
Claim #24229 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the passage of a luminous point across the sky and its unusual zigzag movement: observation of a satellite passing overhead and an autocinetic illusion.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0001]] Summary
On August 4, 2011, at 22:59, a witness observed a luminous point passing from south to north across the sky, reported zigzag movements and variations in intensity, heard no sound, and then lost sight of the object.
Claim #24230 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On August 4, 2011, at 22:59, a witness observes a luminous point passing from south to north across the sky.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
The case explanation states that the reported white luminous point and its timing are consistent with the passage of the IGS1B satellite, recorded at magnitude 2.
Claim #24231 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“along this trajectory, and at the stated time, the passage of the IGS1B satellite, of magnitude 2 (like the star”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0001]] Description
The case explanation states that satellite brightness changes during the passage depending on its exposure to the sun.
Claim #24232 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Its brightness changes during the passage, depending on its exposure to the sun.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
The case explanation states that a satellite moves in a straight or slightly curved line as seen from the ground, which does not correspond to the witness testimony.
Claim #24233 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Of course, as seen from the ground, a satellite moves strictly in a straight line (or a slightly curved one), which does not correspond to the testimony.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
The reported zigzags may have resulted from an optical illusion of physiological origin called an autocinetic illusion.
Claim #24234 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The zigzags described by the witness may result from an optical illusion of physiological origin, called an autocinetic illusion, which occurs when the eye follows a luminous point against a completely black background.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case as B: a probable observation of the passage of a satellite with an autocinetic illusion.
Claim #24235 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified B: probable observation of the passage of a satellite with an autocinetic illusion.”
Source: CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
CUGNAUX (31) 04.08.2011 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod