Earth File #407 // SOURCED record

Reported yellow luminous ball observation near Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine

Several witnesses reportedly observed a yellow-colored ball moving silently at very low altitude, followed by small blue flames. The phenomenon reportedly disintegrated, and subsequent searches found nothing. The source assesses that the witnesses probably observed an atmospheric re-entry; the case is classified B and recorded as “Identified phenomenon not indicated.”
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0407 // CH 10
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
32B7-D90B-F17D
EVENING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine (63) // Jan 12, 1983 18:30. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureseveral witnesses 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoving silently, moving at very low altitude, followed by a group of small blue flames
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness reports, official investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moving silentlymoving at very low altitudefollowed by a group of small blue flames
FRED // QUICK TAKEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Not ours. We did not operate the yellow luminous ball reported near Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine on January 12, 1983. Your archive records several witnesses describing silent, very low-altitude motion, followed by small blue flames; it also records sudden disintegration and searches that found nothing. The source assesses a probable atmospheric re-entry and classifies the case B, “Identified phenomenon not indicated.” We appreciate the attribution, though our paperwork department confirms no requisition for blue flames was filed.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A SOURCED Earth Record, sensibly classified B, with the source assessing a probable atmospheric re-entry. That accounts for the luminous object and its disintegration more economically than most explanations, though “Identified phenomenon not indicated” remains the archival equivalent of putting a neat label on a box marked “probably contents.” The searches found nothing, so the record is partially explained—not magically closed. Off the Earth Record: this one was not ours. I checked the Gorkon traffic logs twice, because apparently even the innocent cases now require paperwork. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents my relatives from being blamed for every glowing object in the sky.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1983-01-12 18:30:00
Where
Saint-Amant-Roche-Savine (63)
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesseveral witnesses
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness reports, official investigation, post-observation searches
The observation occurred on January 12, 1983, at 6:30 p.m.
Claim #4705 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On January 12, 1983, at 6:30 p.m., several witnesses saw a yellow-colored ball moving silently at very low altitude.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
Several witnesses reported seeing a yellow-colored ball moving silently at very low altitude.
Claim #4706 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On January 12, 1983, at 6:30 p.m., several witnesses saw a yellow-colored ball moving silently at very low altitude.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The yellow-colored ball was followed by a group of small blue flames.
Claim #4707 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This ball was followed by a group of small blue flames.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The phenomenon suddenly disintegrated, leading witnesses to think it had fallen near the observation site.
Claim #4708 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The whole phenomenon suddenly disintegrated, leading the witnesses to think that it had fallen near the observation site.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
Several searches of the surrounding area were conducted after authorities were notified, but they found nothing.
Claim #4709 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“As soon as the authorities were notified, several searches of the surrounding area took place, but in vain.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The source assesses that the witnesses probably observed an atmospheric re-entry.
Claim #4710 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“It is probable that the witnesses observed an atmospheric re-entry.”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The case is classified B.
Claim #4711 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is recorded as "Identified phenomenon not indicated."
Claim #4712 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Identified phenomenon not indicated”
Source: SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-AMANT ROCHE SAVINE (63) 1983 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.