Earth File #429 // SOURCED record

Saint-Mitre-les-Remparts colored luminous phenomenon — 14 January 1982

GEIPAN's sourced case record states that a motorist on the road from Martigues near Saint-Mitre-les-Remparts reported a colored luminous phenomenon at around 6:40 a.m. The phenomenon seemed to follow his movements and remained stationary when he stopped; no noise was heard. A single testimony was collected by the gendarmerie. GEIPAN classified the case C because the information was insufficient to validate or invalidate celestial-body or helicopter explanations.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0429 // CH 09
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
F4F3-8B52-8A35
MORNING
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseLIGHT
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATION // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Road from Martigues near Saint-Mitre-les-Remparts // Jan 14, 1982 06:40. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA MORNING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturemotorist, single witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseappeared to follow the motorist's movements, remained stationary when the motorist stopped
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedtestimony, gendarmerie-collected report
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: area appeared to follow the motorist's movementsremained stationary when the motorist stopped
FRED // PAPERWORK OBSERVATIONShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Tovin Raal would call this display “plenty of information.” Tovin Raal also can turn a routine observation pass into an incident report without visibly trying. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
That was ours. The Earth Record reports that, at around 6:40 a.m. on 14 January 1982, a motorist near Saint-Mitre-les-Remparts observed a colored luminous phenomenon that seemed to follow his movements and remain stationary when he stopped. No noise was heard. GEIPAN classified the case C, noting that celestial-body and helicopter explanations could neither be validated nor invalidated. Fair assessment. Our concealment procedures were adequate; the paperwork, less so.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record gives us a single motorist’s report and a Case C classification: the account is too imprecise to validate or invalidate a celestial body or helicopter explanation. Sensible conclusion. “It followed me” is a useful observation, but not yet a flight path, instrument reading, or cosmic admission. The paperwork has correctly stopped short of pretending otherwise. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, you finally noticed us. The Visitor was Zarnok Vell, my Krellian cousin, who regarded a restricted observation corridor as an opening suggestion. He apologized with Zero-G Root Beer while I explained why his flight plan had become a paperwork problem several desks wide. Humanity received the light; I received the forms.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
1982-01-14 06:40:00
Where
Road from Martigues near Saint-Mitre-les-Remparts
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesmotorist, single witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typestestimony, gendarmerie-collected report
The observation date was 14 January 1982.
Claim #4924 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 14/01/1982”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case concerns a colored luminous phenomenon that appeared to follow a motorist during his morning journey.
Claim #4925 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“Observation of a colored luminous phenomenon following a motorist on his morning journey: lack of information.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0001]] Summary
At around 6:40 a.m., a motorist on the road from Martigues near Saint-Mitre-Les-Remparts reported a colored luminous phenomenon that seemed to follow his movements and remain stationary when he stopped; no noise was heard.
Claim #4926 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“On January 14, 1982, at around 6:40 a.m., a motorist on the road from Martigues, at the level of Saint-Mitre-Les-Remparts (13), was intrigued by a colored luminous phenomenon that seemed to follow him in his movements and to remain stationary when the motorist stopped.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0002]] Description
A single testimony was collected by the gendarmerie.
Claim #4927 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected by the gendarmerie.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN considered the celestial-body hypothesis plausible but said it could not be substantiated because the observation lacked precision.
Claim #4929 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The hypothesis is plausible but cannot be substantiated because the other characteristic of the observation is its lack of precision.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0003]] Reexamination analysis
GEIPAN identified Capella, Jupiter, and Vega as possible celestial bodies that could have been misidentified as the phenomenon.
Claim #4930 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 95% extraction confidence
“On the morning of the observation, several celestial bodies could have been the source of the misidentification, at low elevation (Capella 12° and azimuth 323°) or at higher elevation (Jupiter 32° and azimuth 165°, Vega 32° and azimuth 6°).”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0003]] Reexamination analysis
GEIPAN considered a helicopter another possible explanation, but the testimony allowed neither validation nor invalidation of that hypothesis.
Claim #4931 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“If sufficiently distant, the latter may be unrecognizable and inaudible and may also create the perception of a following ball as the witness moved.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0004]] Reexamination analysis
GEIPAN concluded that the testimony was not sufficiently precise to validate or invalidate the celestial-body hypothesis.
Claim #4932 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The testimony is not sufficiently precise to validate or invalidate the celestial-body hypothesis.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0004]] Reexamination analysis
GEIPAN classified the case as C, meaning lack of reliable information.
Claim #4933 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as C: lack of reliable information.”
Source: SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 // [[T0004]] Reexamination analysis
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-MITRE-LES-REMPARTS (13) 14.01.1982 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.